Car Title Loans – Online Car Title Loan Process

July 17th, 2012 No comments

At times like these, people are researching any possible routes to have more cash on hand to pay off bills or in case of an emergency. Car title loans can be a great way to leverage the value that’s in your paid off car to get access to cash for these short-term needs.

Getting your car title loans online is fast. You could be approved in as little as 2 minutes! Even if you do not yet own the title of your vehicle, if you only have a few payments left, the payments may be able to be rolled into your new title loan.

Car title loans are flexible. You choose how long the loan is, there are a number of repayment options. Your first loan payment will not be due until 30 days after the loan has been put in place. The loan amounts are flexible as well. You can get a loan from anywhere from a couple thousand dollars all the way up to $50,000. The loan amounts are based on the value of your vehicle and not your credit score.

Each month, you are only required to pay the interest due on your loan. You can choose to pay more if you wish and whatever you pay on top of the interest will be applied to the principal of your loan. If you miss a payment, don’t worry, the company will work with you to get you back on track.

To qualify for a car title loan, your vehicle should generally have around a $1,000 wholesale value. If you are not sure how much your vehicle is worth, the company can check for you free of charge. The loan can be transferred to you with a check from a local bank or you can choose to be issued a pre-paid debit card for the amount of the loan. Once the car title loan has been completely paid off, the title will be returned to you. Until that time, it will be stored securely with the company.

Be Sociable, Share!

    The Kildonan School for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities

    June 18th, 2012 No comments

    The Kildonan School for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities has been empowering students with dyslexia and language-based learning differences since 1969. The school takes great pride in their students work. Hanging metal art and other projects created by the students can be found lining the halls. Daily one-to-one language tutorials and dyslexia tutors complement the innovative and challenging curriculum presented by the school and encourages the student body to regain their confidence and exercise their strengths.

    In 1950 Diana Hanbury King came to this country. She began teaching at Sidwell Friends School in Washington D.C. At the time this was one of several schools that had a program for dyslexic students under the aegis of Anna Gillingham. The program was directed by Helene Durbrow, who had been trained by Dr. Samuel Orton.

    With encouragement from Dr. Orton, Helene Durbrow had opened Camp Mansfield, a summer program for dyslexic students in Vermont. Mrs. King spent several summers there and in due course was inspired to found Dunnabeck, in Western Pennsylvania. After running the camp for fourteen years, she met Kurt Goldman, who encouraged her to open a school for dyslexic students and offered to provide the necessary funding.

    Horseback riding, skiing, and a strong art program, all of which were a part of the original plan in Pennsylvania, have continued to play an important role in the extra-curricular program. Through the years, the curriculum evolved to offer a wider set of courses and to meet New York State standards. Despite many changes in personnel and in the campus, the school philosophy and objectives remain virtually unchanged. The school continues its mission to meet the needs of the dyslexic population by strengthening language skills, by providing stimulating subject matter courses, and by building confidence and self-esteem.

    The Kildonan School for Dyslexia is nationally accredited and has great facilities located at the foothills of the Berkshires. For more information, please visit Dyslexia School NY.

    Be Sociable, Share!

      Long Term Prospects for Gold – Part 2

      December 28th, 2011 No comments

      To continue my conversation started last week in Part 1: I have studied and am familiar with the historical references to gold and all commodity prices through history. What constitutes a top or bottom of any given wave in the long term cycles of commodities (often running 20-40 years full cycle) is a significant change in the supply-demand balance OR most recently, a change in how fiat money is valued.

      These cycles do not follow some absolute law so that when the commodities as a set go up 250% they must go back down. There is a more fundamental reason commodity prices decline, and it is suppy and demand. The historical reason commodity prices go up is that during times of war or famine, there is a shortage of supply of the given commodity.

      But even if supply and demand are somewhat in balance, price can change in the denominating currency. All the historical references given, except the current period, were during times when the dollar value was fixed by gold. What ruins your analysis using historical reference is that you are comparing gold denominated historical commodity bull markets with the current which is denominated in dollars. Inflation was not a possibility historically. It is only a reality in the past 40 years, since delinking of the dollar from gold in 1971 by Nixon.

      Now, a commodity bull market must first be adjusted for the price of gold, which is a non-consumable commodity and hence, not really subject to supply-demand. It is always in demand to undergird sovereign currencies and supply is relatively fixed. Adjust commodity prices for devaluation of the currency (dollars or Euros) and you will find there has been little if any consumable commodity inflation the past 10 years.

      I repeat, we will not have a peak in this particular commodities cycle until inflation, which is only now starting due to money printing, has run its course. That is probably at least 30 years in our future based on the severity of sovereign debt.

      Yes, we can have short periods of contraction along the path to global inflation of fiat currency based commodities and other hard assets, but ultimately, the need to paper over excessive debt built up in the Developed Markets from 1980 until today (2011) will need to be reversed. That can only come after the sovereign and private sector debts are reduced as a percent of total GDP by paying off in cheaper, more plentiful dollars and Euros. Once cumulative debt is returned to a stable level under 50% of GDP, then the policy makers can reverse course and tighten money supply to reduce inflation as was done in 1980 through 2000. That will end a long period of commodity dominance in terms of investment outperformance.

      Be Sociable, Share!

        A Thought Experiment on Inflation Prospects in 2012 and Beyond

        December 26th, 2011 No comments

        What is the “real” value of an ounce of gold? This is a commonly debated question on the financial blogs. Some feel that gold is worth less than $500 an ounce and in the midst of an historic bubble. Others feel that gold should be worth more than $3000 an ounce. Both can back up their conclusions with arguments that are logical, though maybe missing some important element of valuation such as anticipated inflation in the case of the $500 estimate or historic comparisons in the case of $3000.

        I would like to conduct a little thought exercise about what might constitute a “fair price” (though admittedly, price is set in an open market and just like the weather, it will rarely be the average).

        First, one must accept that gold is a long term store and measure of wealth. This should not be too debatable as gold has been used as a currency and store of value for all of recorded human history. It has many interesting and unique attributes among all the elements. I won’t go over those again as they are well understood. But those attributes and its relative scarcity, make gold valuable over generations and multiple cultures. Most importantly, gold remains today as the basis for all fiat currency. All the world’s major economies hold gold in their vaults to provide confidence in their printed fiat currency. The ratio of reserve gold to total foreign trade reserves in America is about 75%. So, this “indexing” is not trivial. The primary benefit of fiat currency is that it is cheap to create and easy to ship, and in today’s world, lends itself to electronic transfer. And the primary disadvantage is that it is cheap to create and easy to ship. Gold is neither, which is why it has long term value and is the basis for all global trade.

        Once we accept that gold has intrinsic value as a means of exchange, the only problem left is to establish long term “fair value”. This is not so easy to do. Gold has rarely “floated” in the open market. For most of history, the ownership of gold was tightly controlled. It was the means to rule over people and so was hoarded by kings and would-be leaders. Even into the 19th century, after the “reformation” and age of enlightenment, gold was fixed in price by governmental decree, as a currency “standard”. In America, it was worth $18.93 give or take a couple of cents, for most of that century. Even into the 1920s, the price had only been allowed to increase a very little bit, to around $20.

        During most of the 1800s ownership and value of gold was controlled in its role as a global currency. But locking down gold prices to maintain trade stability and hold inflation in check creates its own distortions. If there is a fixed amount of gold as collateral for a currency like the US dollar and gold is held at a fixed price, then as an economy grows through population growth and technical innovation (productivity), it puts strains on the gold price. As of 2011, gold supply has fallen well behind real economic growth since the early 1800s, even with newer techniques for its exploration and production. As of 2009, according to the World Gold Council, global gold supply is 158,000 tonnes. This quantity also represents all the gold ever mined in the history of mankind since gold is indestructible and not often thrown away (though sometimes has been buried and “lost”). Current mining techniques add around 2500 tonnes of gold per year, though it is becoming ever more difficult and expensive to find and mine gold. For the sake of our thought experiment, all gold produced finds its way into collateral for global currencies. In reality, 80% of gold production is consumed by jewelry where its accounting is lost for the purpose of use to buttress national currencies. But it still exists above ground and could always be “confiscated” by governments, as happened during other gold standard periods. So, for our experiment, we will ignore this small issue (which,if anything, reduces central bank supplies of available gold and therefore drives gold prices higher).

        If there is a long term relationship between the price of gold and economic activity as measured by GDP, then gold supply must keep up with growth in that activity to stay at the same price. This is a simple function of supply and demand and the relationship of price to both. If demand rises with real economic growth (both population and productivity), and supply is constant, then price must rise by the amount of growth. Or, if demand was somehow fixed for a year and supply rose by x%, then price for gold would need to fall by x% to maintain equilibrium. Again, this is basic economics of supply and demand.

        But what if supply rises by 1.5%, as it did the past few years with supply growth at 2500 tonnes, yet economic growth as reported by governments in their sovereign currencies grows globally at 3%? Then the price of gold must increase by the percentage difference, or 1.5%. Using basic math, that admittedly requires a 1 to 1 relationship between gold and a national currency, something that has not existed since 1933 in America. But we must also accept that any “leveraging” of gold so that it provides collateral for only a portion of a currency lends leverage to the entire currency regime and makes trading less economically stable. This approach to currency indexing has been called a “fractional standard”, which was in place from the 1930s until 1971 in America.

        Now, let’s return to the fact that gold supply, even assuming every ounce mined is available as tradeable currency, is only growing about 1.5% per year. Even in a fractional system, this then means global economic growth cannot exceed 1.5% without causing a change in the price of gold. But global economic growth is greater than 3%, even during these difficult times. What does this mean for the price of gold? That its price must increase to maintain equilibrium. And this is in the pure environment of our thought experiment. But what happens when gold is priced in the real world? The basic postulations here are well known and widely available to every investor, policy maker and speculator on the planet. Knowing that supply is constantly falling behind real demand, to say nothing of nominal demand, means gold will be bid even higher than the math suggests it should be. So, rather than a 1.5% or 2% increase in the price of gold to keep up with global GDP growth, it might be bid up 5 or 10% instead, in anticipation of the dis-equilibrium.

        But this is not the end of the thought experiment. So far, all the discussion is in “real” or uninflated terms in respect to the currencies we all live with, whether the US Dollar or the Euro. But if government policies of the sovereigntys that print currency case currency to be printed faster than real economic growth (population + productivity) suggests should be the case, then gold price must compensate for the additional “nominal” growth that is purely a function of money printing, whether or not that printed currency finds its way immediately into the economy through the money “multiplier” (a function of leverage through bank lending).

        And this is still not the end of possible reasons that gold price becomes distorted. A further reason is national debt. Debt of the sovereign that is printing currency serves to lever the underlying currency and its economic growth. So, if debt is 100% of the measure of an economy (US GDP for example, and $15 trillion in the case of America), then that debt will apply financial leverage to the currency and will cause the value of gold to change upward to maintain equilbrium. So, if the value of gold must increase 10% annually to accomodate base money printing, as in the case previous, then if there is 100% debt leverage in the money system as there is in America, then it might require gold price appreciation of 20% to maintain equilbrium.

        None of the analysis to this point includes any effect of speculation, whether on even faster money printing by a national government or through gold supply disruption. And it assumes that all gold mined is available to back a currency, which of course it is not. Using this thought experiment, it is possible to see that gold should appreciate 20% per year so long as the global financial policies remain the same as today: 100% debt to GDP on average, in the Developed World economies (those that hold the gold in reserve) and 3% GDP growth. Even in the absence of real economic growth, if additional national debt and dollar printing causes nominal GDP growth, gold price will go higher. If policy makers reverse course at some point, and shrink national debts and reduce base money supplies, and if somehow, gold supply is greatly increased so it at least matches global real economic growth (or if real economic growth shrinks until it matches global supply growth), then, and only then, is there a good case to be made for a declining price in gold. We last saw this phenomena of shrinking money supply and debt in the very early 1980s. It was a twenty year period marked by dis-inflation and declining interest rates. That is also the last time the price of gold (or any other hard asset) declined in price for any length of time. Coincidence? I think not.

        Even with the thesis presented being true, gold still may not represent a good “investment”. It is a currency, not something that grows in value due to technical innovation or population growth (the only two sources of “real” growth). But the mining of gold and other precious metals does benefit from technical innovation and can experience real growth, if not in units then in value. There is also operational leverage in mining as the cost of production is less than the value of the product sold. I favor the miners, and also the oil drillers as a true investment in real (non-devalued) terms.

        I will post some graphs I have created showing the history of gold price vs. GDP since 1833, on my website later today.

        Be Sociable, Share!

          New Levels of Success in Printing Money to Postpone Defaults

          December 22nd, 2011 No comments

          A ponzi to surpass all previous ponzis. And they say the ECB is not allowed to print money. Hogwash! This is money printing extradonaire, well beyond anything the Fed has dreamed up (unless it was the Fed that DID dream this up?)

          http://seekingalpha.com/article/315636-how-gold-silver-and-platinum-will-respond-to-ecb-s-money-printing?source=yahoo

          This was all very predictable. What is the alternative? A long, long European depression and deep global recession? Again I must say: Buy Gold (or Energy, or Ag stocks, or Miners and short the Euro). There is no other protection from this type of devaluation.

          Brian

          Be Sociable, Share!

            Things That Make You Go Hmmmm…..

            October 25th, 2011 No comments

            I normally try to space out my posts by a few days so as not to overwhelm the internet. But something just crossed my PC that is very good reading. It comes to us from John Mauldin and is a reprint of today’s “Outside the Box” from him. This is from writer Grant Wiliams, a new contributor to “Outside the Box” to my knowledge. It is quite a funny take at the start with an appropo reference to baseball.

            Mr. Grant is in complete agreement with my perspective regarding the futility of European economic leaders and the inevitability of an economic crisis precipitated by the EU ministers’ incompetence. He wrote this late last week. The past two days have done nothing but make the column more poignant. Good reading.

            Things That Make You Go Hmmm … “Everyone needs the ECB to step up to the plate. The ECB has no excuse not to act. In trying to keep its monetary virginity intact, the bank threatens to destroy the Euro Zone. If that happens, nobody will be able to profit from its virginity.” – PAUL DE GRAUWE “Simple Math: The total overall cap [of the ESM] is 500 billion Euros 160 billion Euros has been spent 340 billion Euros remains 340 billion Euros + zero Euros = 940 billion Euros“ – Mike Shedlock, on the latest European ‘Masterplan’ to merge the EFSF + ESM “The trouble with quotes on the internet is that it’s difficult to determine whether or not they are genuine” – Abraham Lincoln Lee Richmond, meet everybody. Everybody? Meet Lee Richmond. It’s difficult to put an exact number on the number of games of professional baseball that have been played since 1900 – most estimates seem to be clustered around the high 300,000s though. For the purposes of this exercise, I am going to take the number provided in no-nonsense fashion by Wiki answers: 390,536. In amongst those 390,536 games were home runs, walks, steals, strikeouts and singles, doubles and triples too numerous to keep track of; or rather, just too numerous for anyone but the most die-hard of stat geeks to even contemplate tallying. (at this point, I should apologise to any non-baseball fans amongst you for whom the terms used above have induced a frantic bout of head-scratching and a desire to skip ahead – stick with me for a while longer and the fog will clear – I promise). Part of the innate beauty of baseball to me is the fact that (certainly in the modern era), game by game, season by season every aspect of it is measured, quantified and evaluated and the myriad ways the numbers can be dissected enables you to drill down into any part of it and gain a real understanding, through those numbers, of exactly what is going on. You can’t fudge the numbers. The Oakland Athletics’ Billy Beane showed the power of this approach, which was documented so brilliantly in Michael Lewis’ ‘Moneyball’ But let’s get back to Lee Richmond. In 1880 Richmond became the first of only 20 men in baseball history to pitch a perfect game when he pitched the Worcester Ruby Legs to a 1-0 victory over the Cleveland Blues at the Worcester Agricultural Fairgrounds on June 12. Think about that for a second. Over 130 years. 390,536 games. 2 teams in each contest. That’s 781,072 opportunities for a perfect game to be pitched or, to put it another way, the odds on a perfect game being pitched are 39,053:1 – and rising. In fact, more people have orbited the moon than have pitched a MLB perfect game and NOBODY has done it more than once. (At this point I will again attempt to keep the non-baseball aficionados with us by the use of this short explanation of a ‘perfect game’: A perfect game is defined by Major League Baseball as a game in which a pitcher (or combination of pitchers) pitches a victory that lasts a minimum of nine innings and in which no opposing player reaches base. Thus, the pitcher (or pitchers) cannot allow any hits, walks, hit batsmen, or any opposing player to reach base safely for any other reason – in short, “27 up, 27 down”) Interestingly enough, although it is technically possible for multiple pitchers to combine for a perfect game, to date, every major league perfect game has been thrown by a single pitcher. That record needs to change. And fast. Right now, the team comprising the ECB, EU and the various parliaments that make up that fractured and faltering alliance are sending pitcher after pitcher to the mound (sometimes in groups of two or three) trying to combine for the perfect game that they NEED in order to escape the debt trap they have backed themselves into. Being in a situation where you lose unless you can pull something off against odds of multiple-thousands to one and pitch a ‘perfect game’ is a ridiculous spot in which to find yourself, but as this month has rolled by, it has become ever-more apparent that that is precisely where the Brussels Eurocrats now find themselves. It appears as though, as the pressure has ratcheted up this week, we are now in the ninth inning. Personally, my own belief (as regular readers are by now well aware) is that the very best the Eurocrats can hope for is to extend the game by an inning or two, but their arms are tired, their bullpen is empty and, at some point, we are going to see an absolute avalanche of runs scored against them as the whole thing finally topples under its own weight. This past week has been nothing short of farcical as the tension has built towards a crescendo that seemed at first to be willfully engendered in order to generate just enough sense of impending crisis to enable a resolution to be forced through in a similar fashion to that which preceded Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke’s now-infamous closed-doors fright-fest (hyphenation alert!) that led to the passing of the TARP in late 2008. Obviously any and all capitulation towards outright bailouts (or ‘QEU’) must at least be seen to be against the will of the Germans and that proviso goes a long way towards explaining the raft of headlines that have flooded the Reuters and Bloomberg screens of investors all around the world this week. We have seen misdirection, scaremongering, u-turns and abject incompetence as well as the kinds of ‘leaks’ that are, frankly, laughable – the prime example being the ‘leaked’ draft copy of the Euro Summit statement which was printed, in its entirety, in the Daily Telegraph on Thursday – coincidentally at the precise moment when things were starting to come unglued as it became clear that this Sunday’s Summit would NOT produce the magic bullet required. The statement itself is priceless. It begins with a bit of back-slapping for the passing of the EFSF (after no less than six months of wrangling and an eleventh-hour drama in Slovakia): The strategy we have put into place encompasses determined efforts to ensure fiscal consolidation as well as growth, support to countries in difficulty, and a strengthening of euro area governance. At our 21 July meeting we took a set of major decisions. The ratification by all 17 Member States of the euro area of the measures related to the EFSF significantly strengthen our capacity to react to the crisis. The agreement on a strong legislative package within the EU structures on better economic governance represents another major achievement. The euro continues to rest on solid fundamentals It then moves on to more familiar ground; an agreement to display their strong determination to fix things. Nothing concrete, of course, but they sure as hell are determined: The crisis is, however, far from over, as shown by the volatility of sovereign and corporate debt markets. Further action is needed to restore confidence. That is why today we agree on additional measures reflecting our strong determination to do whatever is required to overcome the present difficulties. The rest of the text, should you want to read it, is here, but allow me to summarise it through a few select phrases that will save you the trouble of doing so: “blah, blah, blah… All Member States are determined, blah, blah, blah… We want to reiterate our determination, blah, blah, blah… We reaffirm clearly our unequivocal commitment that, blah, blah, blah… All other euro area Member States solemnly reaffirm their inflexible determination, blah, blah, blah… The euro area Heads of State or Government fully support this determination, blah, blah, blah… All tools available will be used in an effective way to ensure financial stability in the euro area, blah, blah, blah… We fully support the ECB, blah, blah, blah… “ See. I told you they were determined. But, buried deep in the draft are (amazingly enough) some specific measures that will surely help solve the crisis: • There will be regular Euro Summit meetings bringing together the Heads of State or govern­ment (HoSG) of the euro area and the President of the Commission. These meetings will take place at least twice a year • The President of the Euro Summit will be
            designated by the HoSG of the euro area at the same time the European Council elects its President • The President of the Euro summit will keep the non euro area Member States closely informed of the preparation and outcome of the Summits • As is presently the case, the Eurogroup will ensure ever closer coordination of the economic policies and promoting financial stability. • The President of the Euro Summit will be consulted on the Eurogroup work plan and may invite the President of the Eurogroup to convene a meeting of the Eurogroup, notably to prepare Euro Summits or to follow up on its orientations • Work at the preparatory level will continue to be carried out by the Eurogroup Working Group(EWG) • The EWG will be chaired by a full-time Brussels-based President. He/she should preferably also chair the Economic and Financial Committee …and my personal favourite: • Clear rules and mechanisms will be set up to improve communication and ensure more con­sistent messages. It’s at this point that the non-Europeans amongst you are possibly finally beginning to get the joke that anybody caught in the tractor beam of ineptitude that is ‘Europe’ (and by‘Europe’ I mean the bureaucratic construct rather than the land mass) has understood for years. THIS IS HOW EUROPEAN BUREAUCRACY WORKS, PEOPLE!!!! Millions of Euros spent on days of‘talks’ to come up with solutions that fail to address any REAL problems. Don’t believe me? Article 47 of the Common Fisheries Policy will ensure that every fish caught by an angler is notified to Brussels so that it can be counted against that countries quota. If you go out for a days fishing and catch a couple of cod or mackerel you will now be required to notify the authorities or face a heavy fine. There are EU regulations on the greenness of the person on the pedestrian crossing lights. There are 3 separate EU directives on the loudness of lawnmowers. Regulation (EC) 2257/94 – a great read, by the way – stated that bananas must be ‘free from malformation or abnormal curvature of the fingers’. It also contained stipulations about ‘the grade, i.e. the measurement, in millimetres, of the thickness of a transverse section of the fruit between the lateral faces and the middle, perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis’ … And then there are cucumbers: Under regulation (EEC) No 1677/88 cucumbers are only allowed a bend of 10mm for every 10cm of length. Do you think any of those were drawn up in 10 minutes on a single piece of paper? No. (Actually, in fairness to Europe, they don’t have a monopoly on silly legislation: there IS a law in Alaska that makes it illegal to push a moose out of a moving aircraft.) The Brussels bureaucracy has always been something of a laughing stock amongst the people of Europe – since long before the final creation of the EU, in fact. Way back in 1955, with a European union freshly on the drawing board ten years after the end of WWII, Russell Bretherton, an English Civil Servant was dispatched to Brussels to inform European ministers what Britain thought of plans for an ambitious new European treaty. Upon arrival, he had these words of wisdom for those assembled: “Gentlemen, you’re trying to negotiate something you will never be able to negotiate. If negotiated, it will not be ratified. And if ratified, it will not work” Three years later, the Treaty of Rome was signed, establishing the European Economic Community and from that day to this, the degree of meddling, interference and sheer bureaucracy has increased year after year until we find ourselves here. Europe is broken and the people charged with trying to fix it are clearly not up to the job. There are way too many vested interests, too many national peccadillos and way too many good, old-fashioned egos in play for it to come down to anything but a last-ditch solution when they are forced into it – and that solution WILL be the printing of money in some shape or form which will help to magically inflate the debt away. The other alternatives are either just too painful (default/ forgiveness) or plain unworkable (growth). A look at a selection of newsflashes that hit screens this week shows just how ridiculous things have become as everybody involved in trying to sort out the mess that is Europe attempts to get themselves in front of a microphone in order to let the world know just how important they are. Some of these appearances, it would seem, are stage-managed for maximum effect on markets – others are simply self-important politicians who just can’t bring themselves to utter the words “no comment”: *GERMAN COALITION SOURCES: MERKEL SAYS LEVERAGING EFSF VIA ECB IS RULED OUT *MERKEL TOLD LAWMAKERS MOVING FORWARD MILLIMETER BY MILLIMETER *ECB TRICHET: CAN’T USE MONPOL TO CORRECT FAILURES OF GOVERNMENTS *ECB NEVER ACTS AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR GOVERNMENTS: NEWSPAPER INTERVIEW *FINANCIAL STABILITY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENTS *EMU HAS PRICE STABILITY TODAY; INFLATION EXPECTATIONS FIRMLY ANCHORED *TRICHET REJECTS ASSERTION THAT ECB HAS OVERSTEPPED ITS LIMITS *TRICHET: EURO WILL EXIST IN 10 YEARS *SEIBERT SAYS `DREAMS’ OF SWIFT EURO SOLUTION WON’T MATERIALIZE *GERMAN COALITION SOURCES: MERKEL SAYS LEVERAGING EFSF VIA ECB IS RULED OUT *DJN-DJ REPORT EFSF FIREPOWER TO REACH EUR2T ‘TOTALLY WRONG’-SOURCE *MERKEL SAYS NEXT EU SUMMIT IS `NOT THE END POINT’ FOR CRISIS *DJ GERMAN GOVERNMENT DOESN’T EXCLUDE DELAYING OCT. 23 SUMMIT *MERKEL CANCELS FRIDAY SUMMIT ON LACK OF EFSF DETAILS *MERKEL CANCELS EFSF SPEECH ON DEADLOCK ON LEVERAGING: LAWMAKERS *FRANCE, GERMANY SEE NEED FOR GLOBAL, AMBITIOUS CRISIS RESPONSE And the piece de resistance: *MERKEL SAYS EUROZONE TALKS STUCK. FLIES TO FRANCE: REUTERS *SARKOZY SAYS EUROZONE TALKS STUCK, FLIES TO GERMANY: REUTERS Amidst this barrage of headlines, Nicolas Sarkozy was quoted in two articles which outlined his own fears for Europe: “Allowing the destruction of the euro is to take the risk of the destruction of Europe. Those who destroy Europe and the euro will bear responsibility for resurgence of conflict and division on our continent.” And… “If there isn’t a solution by Sunday, everything is going to collapse” There’s something eerily familiar about that last sentence. Let’s see what Google Translate makes of the original French version, shall we?: “If money isn’t loosened up, this sucker could go down” Those words were uttered by another President on September 26, 2008 – a few days before TARP was passed into law. No matter how long this charade continues, it seems impossible to see how it doesn’t end in a EuroTARP. The ECB have a brand new, never-been-used printing press just sitting there in a locked room waiting to be called into action. The only problem is; the Germans have the key to the door. How long they continue to try to do the ‘right’ thing before capitulating is pretty much the only unknown quantity right now. Having backed themselves into a hopeless corner early last week with promises of a ‘solution’ come the end of this weekend’s summit, the Eurocrats have now postponed the decision until next Wednesday. On hearing this, the markets were eerily calm, as the UK Guardian noted: (UK Guardian): Investors’ thinking seems to be that the adoption of a new deadline – “Wednesday, at the latest,” according to last night’s communiqué – could be construed as good news, or at least neutral from the point of view of share prices and bond prices. This theory says that more time to reach agreement makes a watertight plan more likely to happen. Really? The notion sounds like a triumph of hope over experience. Okay, last night’s statement still promised “a global, ambitious response to the crisis currently facing the Eurozone” but it seems just as likely that more time will simply entrench disagreements between Germany and France. As the clock ticks, the definition of “ambitious” could simply be watered down.. But is this sense of calm justified? Well, in a word, no. Overnight, the latest leaks out of the ongoing Crisis Summit paint an ugly picture about what happens next and, if the
            leaks are anything to go by, we are in for anything BUT a period of calm: (UK Daily Telegraph): Europe’s leaders are threatening to trigger a formal default on Greek debt and risk a “credit event” if banks refuse to accept losses of up to €140bn (£120bn) on their hold­ings. Hardline eurozone members, backed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), delivered the ulti­matum this weekend after an official report found that in a worst-case scenario Greece could need a second bail-out of€450bn – twice the current package and more than the entire €440bn in the eurozone’s rescue fund. Vittorio Grilli, a senior EU official, travelled to Rome yesterday to present the “take it or leave it” deal to the Institute of International Finance, which is leading the negotiations for the banks. “The only voluntary element for the banks now is to take a 50pc haircut or face a credit event, a default,” said an EU diplomat. Apparently, even a once-taboo idea of a centralized Treasury is also now on the table: (UK Daily Telegraph): European Union chiefs are drawing up plans for a single “Treasury” to over­see tax and spending across the 17 eurozone nations. The proposal, put forward by Herman Van Rompuy, the European Council president, would be the clearest sign yet of a new “United States of Europe” — with Britain left on the sidelines. The plan comes as European governments desperately trying to save the euro from collapse last night faced a new bombshell, with sources at the International Monetary Fund saying it would not pay for a second Greek bail-out.. Or how about an EFSF SPV that will attract money from our old friends the Sovereign Wealth Funds (surely, by now, even THEY are starting to understand the folly of investing in these things?): (UK Guardian): Finance ministers from the 17 eurozone countries are discussing the option of creating a “special purpose vehicle” for the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) in order to boost its current€440bn (£383bn) lending capacity. The idea, according to sources, would be to attract further money from official and private inves­tors, with the sovereign wealth funds of countries such as China, Singapore or Qatar a prime target. Some of these already invest in European banks such as Barclays and UBS. So here we are. It’s Sunday morning in Asia as I finish writing this week’s missive and the messages coming out of Europe are as mixed as ever, despite the clear need for a ‘solution’ (which has been perhaps the only consistent communique for about two years now). Sadly for the Eurocrats, the time when they have to stop telling us how important a ‘solution’ IS and actually devise one that WORKS is now at hand. Any more prevaricating and the markets will give them their solution whether they like it or not. The chances are that we will see another photo-op featuring the region’s finance ministers this week as they unveil their latest ‘plan’ that will fix everything. There will be a communique issued which lays out exactly how determined they are to solve everything and quantifies all the important steps they have so far taken as well as the improvements they are seeing in the finances of the PIIGS. There may be some criticism of the banks for forcing them to this point, and there will most likely be certain promises made about how they aim to extract retribution for their forced largesse, but they will take one more swing at a solution – one that stops short of the massive steps they need to take to shore things up once and for all. Then the markets will have their say. Ultimately, the only realistic way to fix Europe’s problems is to shovel money into the gaping hole that is the region’s finances. Which means that the REAL question that has to be answered is fairly simple: Where is that money going to come from? Growth? Nope. Inflation? Not quickly enough. Forgiveness or default? Not if you don’t want M. Sarkozy’s prediction coming true. The ECB’s printing press? Only if you can change German minds. Until German minds are harder to change than the immutable laws of mathematics, I suspect we have our answer. Only one Perfect Game has been thrown in a World Series game – when it REALLY counted. The year was 1956, the pitcher that day was Don Larsen and, as the 27th opposing batter was finally struck out, Larsen leapt into the arms of a man whose words of wisdom have graced the cover of Things That Make You Go Hmmm….. on several occasions: Yogi Berra. The latest European Crisis Summit? Well, as Yogi would probably have said, it’s déja-vu all over again.

            Play Ball!

            Be Sociable, Share!

              Today's Thoughts on Markets and the Economy

              October 25th, 2011 No comments

              Tomorrow is supposed to be the big day when we all hear how Europe will solve its debt problems once and for all. Of course, last week that day was supposed to be last Sunday, but it had to be postponed over disagreements. Guess what? Just now (Tuesday morning), we learn that once again the announcement will be delayed. Government leaders in Europe can’t come to any agreement. Should we be surprised?

              We are getting close to the point where Greece actually defaults and is given relief on its debt obligations. It is said that a 60% write down is now factored into the market (I don’t really believe that is true, but that is what is said). But that still does not get the Greek debt to GDP ratio under 100%, which is considered the safety zone for most countries. An 80% write down gets the rato to 92%. However, Greece has shown no ability to run a government budget surplus, which is required to pay off debt. So, even an 80% write down does not solve their problem. Conclusion: Greece is terminal and the markets need to acknowledge that.

              So, now we move on to Italy (jumping over Portugal, which has almost the same amount of debt as Greece, owed to EU banks, and is just as economically disfunctional, but which is rarely discussed). Italy has over $2T in debt as compared to Greece’s $460B (Portugal’s debt is about $300B). It has a public sector that expects very good pensions and has very high taxation. It also has a central government that has yet to acknowledge economic reality. Greece had to come right to the brink and at risk of losing its foreign funding to keep its government operating, before it began to apply austerity to its people. Italy is not yet at that point. To get politicians to do the unpopular and apply austerity measures, including reducing pensions, lengthening the work week, cutting public payrolls and such, requires a true near-death experience. Italy is not sufficiently scared to make the tough decisions.

              What does this mean? It is that the EU problems will not be solved until it is too late. America in 2008 had to come right to the brink of financial collapse before it provided temporary solutions to save the system (I say temporary, because national debt continues today to grow faster than the economy). But America has all the decision makers in one building. They are easier to corral. Europe, on the other hand, is 17 countries each with very different cultures and agendas. The decision makers do not sit in the same building and have no cultural obligation to each other. They also might believe that someone else’s problems should not become theirs, even though they are all together in an ecnomic union. I find it very unlikely that Europe will address its viral debt issues until it is too late. And even if it does, it will be by adding more debt at the ECB level, which only pushes the problem out to the future.

              All of this means tough sledding for the American economy. Over 20% of American corporate profits (and therefore, jobs) are related to export to Europe. If Europe goes over the cliff, so will the American economy. The current stock market does not acknowledge this reality. Instead, it is being valued on today’s most immediate news, which is earnings. It has been another decent earnings season. And of course that will continue until the economy falters. There has been no over-building of supply which precedes the normal business cycle recession. We will not get a classic “inventory correction” and firings will not spike to signal a coming recession, as happened in 2007 and 2008. Companies are running lean and mean, as shown by high and persistent unemployment. Corporations are also able to refinance debt at ever lower interest rates which also aids earnings. Any additional revenues and resultant margins, fall right to the bottom line.

              The past two years, the market forgets about good earnings once announcements are completed and focuses on macro economic events. Because macro news has been poor the past four years, the market sinks until the first week of earnings announcements each quarter. Earnings expectations are pushed down by analysts by the reality of the global economic problems. Then there is a 4-6 week period of good market action as the positive earnings “surprises” (really, earnings just get marked back up to where they were at the beginning of the quarter) get priced into the market. But once the earnings season is over (that will be around Thanksgiving this year), the market will again focus on the horrible global economic environment, as it did this year in May and August (and May and August in 2010 for that matter), with very bad performance as a result.

              The market may stay positive for another few weeks (providing ANYTHING gets done in Europe this week), but it is a risky trade to get in at this point. I am starting to lighten up my longs and will get shorter as we get closer to Thanksgiving.

              Be Sociable, Share!

                GDXJ Dividends Could Be Substantial

                October 17th, 2011 No comments

                Maybe you can have your cake and eat it too. My opinion on the price of gold is well known. It is going higher simply based on the realities of the global debt overhang and the necessity to print money to resolve that excess debt. However Europe resolves its sovereign debt problems, it will involve printing more money in one form or another. Such action will provide additional support to the price of gold both directly, by devaluing the Euro and Dollar, and indirectly, but encouraging surplus economies to own more gold and less Euros and Dollars in foreign trade reserve accounts.

                Owning gold is one way to protect currency value, but it is not an investment, only a hedge. But the miners that produce gold are in a productive business and have earnings. Most of the miners have costs at around $600 / ounce while the price of gold is well above $1500 per ounce. That is a lot of margin that turns into earnings and cash flow. The junior miners are the smallest and newest. Because they are small and not well known, the junior miners sell at a discount to the older and larger miners. The juniors and seniors average around a 15 PE. But the junior miners have significant undeveloped reserves while the senior miners tend to be losing reserves every year, and must buy junior miners to replensih their minable capacity.

                GDXJ, as a collection of junior miners, has a 10% yield based on last December’s dividend of $2.92 (on a $30 stock). The ETF had only been around for 12 months at that time (first issued in November 2009), so it is not knowable if the dividend will be the same in December 2011. But, those junior miners will have had even more positive cash flow the past 12 months, with gold 20% higher in price while costs have remained flat. So, the dividend should be at least as much as it was. ETFs pass through the aggregate dividends of all stocks in the index, so the $2.92 would not have been a one-off event.

                I own GDXJ call options with 2012 expiration (a lot of them). I also own a few hundred shares outright. It might be a very good play right now to buy up GDXJ for a very nice payout in December.

                The following chart shows that (a) GDXJ is undervalued as compared to the price of gold bullion (GLD, the red line) and needs to appreciate by 50% in respect to GLD to track its price as it did in the past; (b) the relative strength of GDXJ (RSI) is right at 50 over the past two years as compared to SP500, meaning it trades with the overall market not too much beta; (c) MACD just turned positive the past week meaning at least a short term move higher. If another 10% dividend is announced between now and December 1, that will provide at least 10% support for the ETF price which does not appear to have priced in a dividend.

                Be Sociable, Share!

                  The Coast is Clear (Not!)

                  October 7th, 2011 No comments

                  Should we all become too excited or complacent by today’s (Friday’s) positive employment report from the Federal government, I have included here an interview on Wednesday, October 5, between David Faber and Kyle Bass.

                  Bass has been one of the more outspoken, but accurate, commentators on the global financial meltdown. He was ahead of the curve on the mortgage crisis in America in 2006-07 and is now calling for a similar economic meltdown due to excessive sovereign debt in Europe. Even though Europe finance ministers have recently talked about “recapitalizing” their banking system, it is very questionable whether the European sovereigns have the resources or political will to do so. Temporarily, the market has taken solace in this talk of a “plan” to recap the banks and backstop the insolvent countries (recapitalize with what? more debt?). This has bought time and is allowing the markets to bounce off 52 week lows.

                  But there will come another crisis in the next 2-3 weeks when the resolve of the financial leaders and their voting electorates in Europe are again tested and all the old questions about the ability to stop the meltdown will again be asked. The market will again decline back towards lows. One of these cycles, the test of policy makers will fail and so will the market. It is a time to be very careful.

                  I did cover some of my short position earlier this week (1/3) and added slightly to my long positions. But this is for a short term trade and I will reverse those positions as the market nears its short term top, probably around SP500 = 1200.

                  Here is the interview with Kyle Bass.

                  Kyle Bass Interview – Part 1:

                  http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000048868

                  Kyle Bass Interview – Part 2:

                  http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000049505

                  Be Sociable, Share!

                    Please pass to everyone you know!

                    October 4th, 2011 No comments

                    This from my friend, Don Tucker, who is on my “investor mailing list”. I think you might find it not far from the truth.

                    Danke Sehr / Thank you

                    Brian McMorris Sr. OEM Account Manager Email: brian.mcmorris@sick.com 2012 CAMPAIGN POSTER.docx

                    Be Sociable, Share!